Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tena Lukas vs Lucija Ciric Bagaric Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lukas vs Bagaric analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Tena Lukas vs Lucija Ciric Bagaric Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lukas 2 - 0 Bagaric
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lukas has won 41.12% of points on their second serve, while Bagaric has won 48.05%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lukas, in recent form, has won 57.18% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bagaric has won 58.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.53% and 45.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lukas has saved 50.3% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bagaric has saved 53.78% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lukas has won 59.74% of matches played (W/L 46/ 31), with Bagaric winning 73.97% (W/L 54/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lukas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 387/ 242), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 32% (W/L 21/ 44). Bagaric has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 77% (W/L 24/ 7), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Lukas has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.64% of matches (W/L 45/ 28), where as Bagaric has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 51/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Lukas winning 2 times and Bagaric being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Lukas winning 4 and Bagaric winning 1. The last match between Lukas and Bagaric was at the W60 Vrnjacka Banja, 22-09-2022, First, Clay with Tena Lukas getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lukas and Bagaric have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lukas winning 1 times and Bagaric 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Lukas winning 1, and Bagaric 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lukas has played against opponents with an average rank of 261.47 while Bagaric has played against players with an average rank of 283.64.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lukas has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bagaric has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lukas has converted 50.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bagaric has converted 52.6% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
224
Rank
200
High
29
Age
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
170
Rank
167
High
20
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
58% (426-313)
Career Total W/L
67% (114-55)
56% (19-15)
YTD W/L
78% (29-8)
$31,490
Career Prize Money
$73,000
1
YTD Titles
4
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Tena Lukas vs Lucija Ciric Bagaric For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Lukas VS Bagaric
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Tena Lukas | Lucija Ciric Bagaric |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 26 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| DFs Total | 12 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:30 | 1:32:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (77/123) | 63% (85/135) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (56/77) | 52% (44/85) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 39% (18/46) | 44% (22/50) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 79% (11/14) | 60% (6/10) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (69/135) | 40% (49/123) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Tena Lukas
Player
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
| 1-6 7-6(4) 6-0 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
1
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tena Lukas | Lucija Ciric Bagaric |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (19/15) | 78% (29/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (45/38) | 74% (60/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (379/371) | 60% (435/293) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 100% (8/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 58% (18/13) | 75% (21/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 82 | 52 |
| DFs per game | 0.62 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 227 | 82 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:31:46 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 247.35 | 283.05 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1483/2502) | 62% (1423/2297) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (874/1483) | 63% (902/1423) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (419/1019) | 48% (420/874) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (175/349) | 53% (172/327) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (1206/2504) | 49% (1126/2276) |
| Slam W/L | 25% (1/3) | 60% (3/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (18/12) | 81% (26/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (19/34) | 77% (27/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 53% (8/15) | 56% (5/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (18/14) | 93% (28/26) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (18/4) | 7% (28/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 31% (16/5) | 33% (9/3) |
Tena Lukas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Tena Lukas
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Katy Dunne
63%
(
80 of
126)
1st Serve %
54%
(
82 of
152)
7
Aces
6
12
Double Faults
8
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
52 of
82)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
46 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
61 of
152)
141
Total Points Won
137
|
6-7(6) 6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Tena Lukas
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
74
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lia Karatancheva
Player
Tena Lukas
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
9
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lola Radivojevic
Player
Tena Lukas
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Alexandra Eala
58%
(
80 of
139)
1st Serve %
68%
(
68 of
100)
8
Aces
1
21
Double Faults
4
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
29%
(
17 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
69 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
51 of
100)
121
Total Points Won
118
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasiya Soboleva
Player
Tena Lukas
76%
(
70 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
53%
(
49 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Kaylah Mcphee
66%
(
82 of
125)
1st Serve %
80%
(
79 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
55 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 6-0 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Tena Lukas
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
34 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Lucija Ciric Bagaric Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Xiyu Wang
Player
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Ella Seidel
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
36 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
0-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
66%
(
80 of
122)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
47%
(
57 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
101)
117
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 6-7(8) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Sara Saito
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Rebecca Marino
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Arina Rodionova
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
51%
(
39 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-0 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Oceane Dodin
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Lukas Vs Bagaric Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Lukas are available here and Bagaric photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
